THE REGOSCOPE WORKSPACE

One place to follow the change.
One trail back to the source.

Regoscope is the regulatory reading environment for actuarial teams. It connects the signal, source edition, changed requirement, cited answer, and reviewed interpretation without pretending to make the professional decision.

Map your workflow ↗
LIVE HORIZON
Illustrative workspace
EIOPAFinal guidance3 changes

Reporting and disclosure requirements

Capital reporting threshold increased. Transitional wording removed.

PREVIOUS2025.4
compared
CURRENT2026.1
“The reporting threshold is revised for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026.”

THE READING JOURNEY

Designed around what happens after the alert arrives.

Most monitoring tools end at notification. Regoscope carries the reader from discovery to durable team understanding.

01

Shape your horizon

Follow the authorities, jurisdictions, topics, and publication series that matter to your actuarial remit.

02

Open the change

See the current edition beside its predecessor, with added, removed, and changed requirements isolated.

03

Question the evidence

Ask in natural language and inspect each claim against the requirement and primary passage behind it.

04

Keep what matters

Save publications, comparisons, searches, and conversations so research survives the browser tab.

05

Publish with authority

Route interpretation to an authorised reviewer. Readers see status, reviewer, decision time, edition, and source.

INSPECTABLE BY DEFAULT

Ask the regulation. Then open the evidence.

Answers remain useful because their lineage is part of the interface, not a footnote added after generation.

VERIFICATION VIEW
Illustrative product experience
ASK REGOSCOPEWhat changed in the capital reporting threshold?
AuthorityEditionRequirementPassage
“The reporting threshold is revised to £7.5 million for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026.”

THE PRODUCT BOUNDARY

Regoscope informs judgment. It does not claim implementation.

Regoscope answers: What was published? What changed? Where is the evidence? What has the team reviewed?

It does not decide whether your organisation has implemented a requirement, complete an applicability assessment, or replace professional review.

Read the trust model